I don’t know why, but there are still some people who, despite the overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary, believe that there is such a thing as a fixed personality type.
Another nail in the coffin of fixed identifiable personality comes from an article in the current (March) Scientific American entitled “What Makes Each Brain Unique.” A brief summary of this article can be found at the link below, but the full article is well worth the read.… [read more]
Often I hear employees being praised—or even hired—for their ability to multitask. The truth is, as much recent research has shown, the multitasker will do all of the tasks he or she is multitasking on less than optimally. Below is a neat summary of the recent research.… [read more]
Interesting research published in a just-released book “Ancestors and Relatives” by Eviatar Zerubavel contains really important lessons for all of us charged with putting teams together, generating ‘engagement’ or wanting to stem the attrition of valuable people.
The book details the human drive to find community and, more importantly, “social identities.” For example between the 1960 and 1980 US census the American Indian population rose from 524 million to 1.3 million.… [read more]
Power makes people make bad decisions according to a research paper published today. Powerful people overestimate their own knowledge and this leads to bad decision making. There is a lovely quote from one of the researchers:
… [read more]
Power is an elixir, a self-esteem enhancing drug that surges through the brain telling you how great your ideas are.
Nearly all organizations espouse diversity and, depending on who you talk to, do or do not have it. The problem, as UCLA researchers have found, is that the word, like so many generalizations, means different things to different people.
What people see as diverse depends, according to the researchers, on people’s “social dominance orientation” (essentially how open they are to change).… [read more]
The youth unemployment in the UK (and probably in the US as well) is over 22% and rising according to a study published today by the Economic and Social Research Council. The reason for this is what the study calls a ‘double penalty.’ They are the first to get laid off when a firm downsizes and they do not have the experience and the skills to easily get another job.… [read more]
The genetics and neurochemistry of decision making is a highly controversial area but one which will become very relevant as science makes it possible to genetically and neurobiologically identify the right person to handle certain types of high-level decisions (a CFO or CEO for example).… [read more]
Now a study published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B has shown that carriers of a certain gene—MAOA-L—are better at making financial decisions in conditions of risk. Perhaps it means that, as with hunter-gatherer tribes’ council of elders, organizations need a system whereby major decisions are not made by a single person.… [read more]
A lot has been written about the benefits and problems flowing from globalization, but until now little hard research has been done as to how the loss of manufacturing jobs has actually affected people generally in “developed” countries. Now a study by MIT researchers has, at last, some answers.… [read more]
An interesting piece of research from the University of California shows that we can be most over-optimistic about possible outcomes when we are stressed. Intuitively it should be the other way around, but this study confirms, yet again, that our intuitions and assumptions about the way the human mind works are very often just plain wrong.… [read more]