menu

Don't make major decisions on an empty stomach

September 22, 2019

Listen to this article

Don't make major decisions on an empty stomach

New research suggests that people might want to avoid making any important decisions about the future on an empty stomach.

The study found that hunger significantly altered people’s decision-making, making them impatient and more likely to settle for a small reward that arrives sooner than a larger one promised at a later date.

Participants in the study were asked questions relating to food, money and other rewards when satiated and again when they had skipped a meal.

What the researchers say: While it was perhaps unsurprising that hungry people were more likely to settle for smaller food incentives that arrived sooner, the researchers found that being hungry actually changes preferences for rewards entirely unrelated to food.

This reluctance to defer gratification may carry over into other kinds of decisions, such as financial and interpersonal ones. The researchers believe it is important that people know that hunger might affect their preferences in ways they don’t necessarily predict.

There is also a danger that people experiencing hunger due to poverty may make decisions that entrench their situation (such as voting for DT or BJ).

“We found there was a large effect, people’s preferences shifted dramatically from the long to short term when hungry,” he said. “This is an aspect of human behavior which could potentially be exploited by marketers so people need to know their preferences may change when hungry.

“People generally know that when they are hungry they shouldn’t really go food shopping because they are more likely to make choices that are either unhealthy or indulgent. Our research suggests this could have an impact on other kinds of decisions as well. Say you were going to speak with a pensions or mortgage advisor—doing so while hungry might make you care a bit more about immediate gratification at the expense of a potentially rosier future,” said the lead author.

“This work fits into a larger effort in psychology and behavioral economics to map the factors that influence our decision making,” commented the researchers. Potentially this empowers people as they may foresee and mitigate the effects of hunger, for example, that might bias their decision making away from their long-term goals.”

The researchers noted that if you offer people a reward now or double that reward in the future, they were normally willing to wait for 35 days to double the reward, but when hungry this plummeted to only three days.

The work builds on a well-known psychological study where children were offered one marshmallow immediately, or two if they were willing to wait 15 minutes.

Those children who accepted the initial offering were classed as more impulsive than those who could delay gratification and wait for the larger reward. But it may be that the kids who wanted the early marshmallow were simply hungry, rather than impulsive.

“We wanted to know whether being in a state of hunger had a specific effect on how you make decisions only relating to food or if it had broader effects, and this research suggests decision-making gets more present-focused when people are hungry,” said the researchers.

“You would predict that hunger would impact people’s preferences relating to food, but it is not yet clear why people get more present-focused for completely unrelated rewards.

“We hear of children going to school without having had breakfast, many people are on calorie restriction diets, and lots of people fast for religious reasons. Hunger is so common that it is important to understand the non-obvious ways in which our preferences and decisions may be affected by it.”

So, what? This is an important study because it throws light on many facets of our decision-making, and the way we deal with people who are hungry. I think it also links into a situation in which a person isn’t actually physically hungry, but “feels” deprived in some way: for example, when he or she works with or encounters those who make more that he or she does, or who owns more than he or she does. Both hunger and envy can lead to irrational decision making.

Dr Bob Murray

Bob Murray, MBA, PhD (Clinical Psychology), is an internationally recognised expert in strategy, leadership, influencing, human motivation and behavioural change.

Join the discussion

More from this issue of TR

September 22, 2019
No items found.

Join our tribe

Subscribe to Dr. Bob Murray’s Today’s Research, a free weekly roundup of the latest research in a wide range of scientific disciplines. Explore leadership, strategy, culture, business and social trends, and executive health.